Labor judicial protection agaisnt anti-union practices. Whether the anti-union conduct of a site manager can be considered as undertaken by the employer

Commentary on the ruling of the Second Labor Court of First Instance dated March 15, 2013, RIT S-14-2012, “Santiago Provincial Labor Inspectorate v. Consorcio Construcciones RSN Limitada”

Authors

  • Alfredo Sierra Herrero

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70635/riej.vi1.125

Keywords:

Anti-union practice, company legal representation, construction foreman

Abstract

This work is a commentary on a judgment that discusses the possibility of holding fiable a construction company far an anti-union practices, as a consequence of the harassment against union members carried out by a foreman of the said company.

Published

2014-08-30

How to Cite

Sierra Herrero, A. (2014). Labor judicial protection agaisnt anti-union practices. Whether the anti-union conduct of a site manager can be considered as undertaken by the employer: Commentary on the ruling of the Second Labor Court of First Instance dated March 15, 2013, RIT S-14-2012, “Santiago Provincial Labor Inspectorate v. Consorcio Construcciones RSN Limitada”. Journal of Judicial Studies, (1). https://doi.org/10.70635/riej.vi1.125

Issue

Section

Comentarios de Jurisprudencia