Discursive Tensions and Convergences:

Reflections on Chile's Law 21.675 on Gender-Based Violence and Feminist Frameworks

Abstract

This article examines Chile’s recently enacted Law No. 21.675 through a critical frame analysis approach, in dialogue with feminist and intersectional organizations. By analyzing parliamentary debates, reports from feminist organizations, and interviews with key stakeholders, the study identifies four interpretative frames surrounding gender-based violence: (1) domestic violence, (2) violence against women based on gender, (3) gender-based violence as a feminist and intersectional issue, and (4) “violence has no gender.” The findings reveal tensions between institutional discourse and the historical demands of feminist movements, along with partial convergences in recognizing structural violence. The article explores the symbolic, normative, and political limits of the law in transforming gender power relations. It concludes that despite legislative progress, Law No. 21.675 reproduces certain traditional representations and omits critical voices. Its transformative potential will depend on its implementation and a genuine commitment to inclusive and feminist governance.