Journal of Judicial Studies N° 8
HOW IT ALL BEGAN – EXPLORING THE THEORETICAL CONCEPTUALISATIONS OF ABSOLUTE RIGHTS
Ana Zdravković
Institute of Comparative Law in Belgrade
Abstract
The concept of absolute rights occupies a contentious space in both academic literature and legal practice. The aim of the paper is to shed light on the philosophical explanations of the term, by contrasting philosophical paradigms – deontological ethics, which uphold the intrinsic wrongness of certain actions irrespective of outcomes, and consequentialist ethics, which prioritize the out- comes and may justify overriding rights for some greater good. Starting from the caveat regarding the intricate relationship between moral and legal human rights and differing viewpoints on their interconnectedness, it offers a comprehensive examination of theoretical interpretations of absolute rights, with the special em- phasis on the effects that 9/11 attacks may have had on the theoretical positions. Ultimately, the objective of the analysis is to contribute to the broader discourse on human rights by offering a recapitulation of an important academic debate that has yet to be concluded.
KEYWORDS:
Absolute rights; human rights; deontology; consequentialism; prohibition of torture.
HOW TO CITE
Zdravković, Ana (2024). “How It All Began – Exploring the Theoretical Conceptualisations of Absolute Rights”, Revista de Estudios Judiciales (8), pp. 5-47
DATES
Received date: 06/06/2024
Acceptance date: 10/07/2024
Publication date: 30/08/2024
Bibliography
Adams, Robert M. (1993), «Religious Ethics in a Pluralistic Society». In: Outka, Gene and Reeder, John P. (editors), Prospects for a Common Mo- rality, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 93-113, DOI https:// doi.org/10.1515/9781400820818.93
Addo, Michael K., and Grief, Nicholas (1998), «Does Article 3 of The European Convention on Human Rights Enshrine Absolute Rights?», European Journal of International Law, (9), 510–524, DOI https://doi. org/10.1093/ejil/9.3.510
Allhoff, Fritz (2005), «A Defense of Torture: Separation of Cases, Tick- ing Time-bombs, and Moral Justification», International Journal of Applied Philosophy, (19/2), 243–264, DOI https://doi.org/10.5840/ ijap200519213
Allison, Lincoln (1990), «The Utilitarian Ethics of Punishment and Tor- ture». In: Lincoln, Allison (editor), The Utilitarian Response: Essays on the Contemporary Viability of Utilitarian Political Philosophy, London: Sage Publications, pp. 9-29.
Bassiouni, M. Cherif (2005), «Great Nations and Torture». In: Greenberg, Karen J. (editor), The Torture Debate in America, Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, pp. 256-260, DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511511110.020
Bedau, Hugo (1968), «The Right to Life», The Monist, (52/4), 550-572, DOI https://doi.org/10.5840/monist196852424
Beitz, Charles (2011), The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford Univer- sity Press.
Besson, Samantha (2018), «International Human Rights Law and Mirrors», ESIL Reflections (7/2), https://esil-sedi.eu/fr/esil-reflection-internation- al-human-rights-law-and-mirrors/ (accessed: 12.12.2023)
Blackstone, Sir William (1893), Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Books (Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co.), Vol. 1 – Books I & II,
Chapter I: Of the Absolute Rights of Individuals (available online via Liberty Fund, Inc https://oll.libertyfund.org/page/blackstone-on-the-ab- solute-rights-of-individuals-1753) (accessed: 12.12.2023)
Bourgon, Stephane (2003), «The Impact of Terrorism on the Principle of ‘Non-Refoulement’ of Refugees: The Suresh Case before the Supreme Court of Canada», Journal of International Criminal Justice, (1), 169-185, DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/1.1.169
Buchanan, Allen (2013),s The Heart of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Çalı, Bașak (2020), «International Legal Human Rights and Moral Human Rights Friends Or a Foes?». In: Varadi, Tibor and Jovanović, Miodrag (editors), Human Rights in the 21st Century, Eleven International Pub- lishing and the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, pp. 13–25.
Chesney, Robert M. (2008), «Boumediene v. Bush», The American Jour- nal of International Law, (102/4), pp. 848-854, DOI https://doi. org/10.2307/20456685
Ćorić, Vesna and Knežević Bojović, Ana (2020), «Autonomous Concepts and Status Quo Method: Quest for Coherent Protection of Human Rights before European Supranational Courts», Strani pravni život, (64/4), pp. 27-40, DOI https://doi.org/10.5937/spz64-30165
De Schutter, Olivier (2014), International Human Rights Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dembour, Marie-Benedicte (2006), Who Believes in Human Rights?: Reflec- tions on the European Convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dershowitz, Alan M (2004), «Torture Reasoning». In: Levinson, Sanford (ed- itor), Torture: A Collection, Oxford: Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 257-290, DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195172898.003.0014
Dershowitz, Alan M (2002), Why Terrorism Works – Understanding the Threat Responding to the Challenge. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Donnelly, Jack (1982), «Human Rights as Natural Rights», Human Rights Quarterly, (4), pp. 391-405, DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/762225
Drake, Richard (2006), «The Aldo Moro Murder Case in Retrospect», Journal of Cold War Studies, (8/2), pp. 114-125, DOI https://doi.org/10.1162/ jcws.2006.8.2.114
Elshtain, Jean Bethke (2004), “Reflection on the Problem of ‘Dirty Hands’”. In: Levinson, Sanford (editor), Torture: A Collection, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 77-89, DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/ oso/9780195172898.003.0004
Encyclopedia Britannica – A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, Literature and Other Information, 11th ed. (New York: Cambridge University Press), Vol. 27
Felner, Eitan (2005). “Torture and Terrorism: Painful Lessons Learned from Israel”. In: Roth, Kenneth, Worden, Minky and Bernstein, Amy (editors), Torture: Does It Make Us Safer? Is It Ever Ok? A Human Rights Perspective, The New Press, pp. 28-43.
Finnis, John (2016), «Absolute Rights: Some Problems Illustrated», The American Journal of Jurisprudence (61/2), pp. 195-215, DOI https:// doi.org/10.1093/ajj/auw015
Finnis, John (1980), Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Foot, Philippa (1967). «The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect», Oxford Review, (5), pp. 5-15.
Fox, Elizabeth (1985), «A Prosecution in Trouble». Atlantic Monthly (3), as cited in Dershowitz, Alan M (2002). Why Terrorism Works – Under- standing the Threat Responding to the Challenge. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Gewirth, Alan (1981). «Are There Any Absolute Rights?», The Philosophical Quarterly, (31/122), 1–16, DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/2218674
Gewirth, Alan (1982). «There Are Absolute Rights», The Philosophical Quar- terly, (32/ 129), pp. 348–353, DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/2218701
Griffin, James (2008). On Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
Hart, Herbert L A (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Invernizzi-Accetti, Carlo (2018), «Reconciling Legal Positivism and Human Rights: Hans Kelsen’s Argument from Relativism», Journal of Human Rights, (17/2), pp. 215-228, DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835 .2017.1332519
Langbein, John (1977). Torture and the Law of Proof. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levinson, Jerrold (1982). «Gewirth on Absolute Rights», The Philosophical
Quarterly, (32/126), pp. 73–75, DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/2219003
Luban, David J (2005), «Liberalism, Torture and the Ticking Bomb», Virgin- ia Law Review (91), pp. 1425-1461, DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 1-4020-4678-0_15
Mackie, John Laslie (1984). “Rights, Utility, and Universalization”. In: Frey, Raymond G (editor), Utility and Rights. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 86-106.
Matijević, Milica V. (2021). “Some Critical Reflections on the Broad Human Rights Constitutionalisation”. In: Nikolić, Oliver and Čolović Vladimir (editors), Constitututio lex superior: sećanje na profesora Pavla Nikolića, Belgrade: Institut za uporedno pravo, pp. 155-172.
Matthews, Richard (2008). The Absolute Violation – Why Torture Must Be Prohibited. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Mavronicola, Natasa (2021). Torture, Inhumanity and Degradation under Article 3 of the ECHR – Absolute Rights and Absolute Wrong. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
McCoy, Alfred W (2006). A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation, from the Cold War to the War on Terror. New York: Metropolitan Books.
McNaughton, David (1999). “Deontological ethics”. In: Craig, Edward (editor), Concise Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Routledge, pp. 424– 458, DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195325911.003.0016
Moran, Sherwood F (2007). “Suggestions for Japanese Interpreters”. In: Schulz, William F (editor). The Phenomenon of Torture, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 249–254.
Nagel, Thomas (1988). “War and Massacre”. In: Scheffler, Samuel (editor), Consequentialism and its Critics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 51-73.
Nagel, Thomas (1979). Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer- sity Press.
Nozick, Robert (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell Pub- lishers Ltd.
Perry, Michael J. (1998). The Idea of Human Rights: Four Inquiries. New York: Oxford University Press.
Peters, Edward (1996). Torture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Quinn, Philip L. (1996). “Relativism about Torture: Religious and Secular Responses”. In: Phillips, D Z (editor), Religion and Morality, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 151–171.
Rawls, John (1999). The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Raz, Joseph (2010). “Human Rights Without Foundations”. In: Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (editors), The Philosophy of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 321-339.
Rieff, David (2002). «Review: The Bureaucrat of Torture», World Policy Journal, (19/1), pp. 105–110.
Ross, William David (1930). The Right and the Good. New York: Oxford University Press.
Scheffler, Samuel (1988). “Introduction”. In: Scheffler, Samuel (editor), Con- sequentialism and its Critics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-14.
Scheffler, Samuel (2003). The Rejection of Consequentialism – A Philosophical Investigation of the Considerations Underlying Rival Moral Conceptions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, Amartya (1988). “Rights and Agency”. In: Scheffler, Samuel (editor), Consequentialism and its Critics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 191–196.
Shafer-Landau, Russ (1995). «Specifying Absolute Rights», Arizona Law Review, (37), pp. 209-225.
Shelton, Dinah and Gould, Ariel (2013). “Positive and Negative Obliga- tions”. In: Shelton, Dinah (editor), The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law, Oxford University Press, pp. 562-586, DOI https:// doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199640133.001.000
Shue, Henry (1978), «Torture», Philosophy and Public Affairs, (7/2), pp. 124–143.
Sussman, David (2005). «What’s Wrong with Torture?», Philosophy and Public Affairs, (33/1), pp. 1-33, DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088- 4963.2005.00023.x
Tasioulas, John (2014). “Taking Rights out of Human Rights”. In: Crisp, Roger (editor), Griffin on Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9-46.
Thomson, Judith Jarvis (1990). The Realm of Rights. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Twining, W. L. and Twining P. E. (1973). «Bentham on Torture», Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, (24), pp. 305-356.
Twiss, Sumner B (2007). «Torture, Justification, and Human Rights: Toward an Absolute Proscription», Human Rights Quarterly, (29), pp. 346–67, DOI https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2007.0025
van Duffel, Siegfried (2013). “Moral Philosophy”. In: Shelton, Dinah (ed- itor), The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law. Ox- ford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33-34, DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/ law/9780199640133.001.000
Waldron, Jeremy (2010). Torture, Terror, and Trade-Offs: Philosophy for the White House. New York: Oxford University Press.